Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-11

WRIT - C No. 9136 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 9136 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 9136 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 9136 of 2026 Beena Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shanti Dhar Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pradeep Singh Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed herein, no useful purpose would be served by putting the opposite party to notice and keeping this petition pending before this Court. However, in case the opposite party feels aggrieved by the order his/her right to seek modification/variation of the order is being kept reserved. 3. The basic relief sought by the petitioner in the present writ petition is to direct the Respondent No.2 i.e., Naib Tehsildar, Tehsil Lalganj, District Mirzapur to decide the recall application in Case RST No.1781 of 2024 (Computerized Case No.T202416530201781), Bandana Srivastava Vs. State of U.P.) under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, within stipulated period. 4. It is argued by the counsel for the petitioner that as per provisions contained under sub-rule (7) of Rules 34 of the U.P. Revenue Cod

WRIT - C No. 9136 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam