Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-11

WRIT - C No. 8969 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 8969 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 8969 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 8969 of 2026 Raj Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of Uttar Pradesh And 22 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rameshwar Gaud, Vijay Kumar Maurya Counsel for Respondent(s) : Azad Rai, C.S.C. Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed today, notices need not be issued to the private-respondents. 3. The only prayer made by the petitioner in the present writ petition is to direct the Respondent No.2 namely Upziladhikari (Judicial), Tehsil- Handia, District Prayagraj to consider and decide the Case No.3519 of 2023 (Computerized Case No.T202302030403519), Bhagauti Prasad & others vs. Raj Kumar and others, under Section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within stipulated period. 4. Heard counsel for the parties. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue, the present writ petition is disposed of finally with a direction to the Respondent No.2 namely Upziladhikari (Judicial), Tehsil- Handia, District Prayagraj, to decide the aforesaid case in accordance with

WRIT - C No. 8969 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam