Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-11

WRIT - C No. 5386 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 5386 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 5386 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 5386 of 2026 Rajkumar .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Kumar Maurya Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Kumar Gupta Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that representation dated 27.11.2025 was submitted by the petitioner before the respondent No.3/Sub Divisional Officer/Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Sadar, District Basti alleging that the private respondent, i.e. respondent No.6/Manoj Kumar Yadav is raising permanent constructions over the land belonging to the Gaon Sabha situtated at Gata No.185 village Gauri Block Bankati District Basti. 2. From perusal of the aforesaid representation as well as the present petition, the Court is of the opinion that the relief has been sought by the petitioner is against the private persons. Law is well settled that mandamus cannot be issued against a private person and the petitioner has remedy to initiate proceedings under the common law. 3. In this view of the matter, the present petition is dismissed with liberty to avail common law remedy, if so adv

WRIT - C No. 5386 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam