WRIT - C No. 2048 of 2026 at Lucknow

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 2048 of 2026 Chandani Gautam .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Shashan Lko And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Reependra Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein the writ petitioners are aggrieved by the rejection of the petitioners' claim under the scheme of Mukhymantri Krishak Durghatna Kalyan Yojana by an order dated 29.11.2025 passed by the respondent No.2 on the ground that the petitioners had made their claim belatedly after a period of 180 days. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners relies upon the judgement passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Smt. Sarvesh Devi Vs. The State of U.P. and 3 others (Writ-C No.27527 of 2023). 4. In the said judgement, a Division Bench of this Court had heard the matter and had after considering the judgement in Gautam Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and 3 others reported in 2020 (11) ADJ 321 reite