WRIT - C No. 1005332 of 2005 at Lucknow

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 1005332 of 2005 Ram Charan .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Thru Secy. Revenue And 4 Ors. .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pushpa Kumari Mishra, Aasif Razzaque Khan, Ajai, Ashutosh Kumar Srivastava, Puspa Mishra, Vimal Kishore Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Chhote Lal Yadav, D.K. Pathak, Farooq Ayoob, Mohd. Sami, R.N. Gupta Court No. - 4 HON'BLE IRSHAD ALI, J. 1. Seen office report dated 16.12.2025 whereby it has been reported that notice was issued to opposite party no.4 on 13.11.2025, dispatched on 14.11.2025 has not been received back nor any vakalatnama has been filled till date. Hence, service of notice is deemed sufficient upon opposite party no.4 in view of Chapter VIII Rule 12, Explanation II of the High Court Rules. 2. Heard Shri Ashutosh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents- State and Shri C.L. Yadav, learned counsel for the respondent no.5. 3. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner is challenging the order dated 30.5.2005 contained in Annexure-1 to the writ petition. 4. Factual matrix of the case is th