Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-31

WRIT - C No. 1003122 of 2000 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 1003122 of 2000 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 1003122 of 2000 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 1003122 of 2000 Vijay Shankar And Another .....Petitioner(s) Versus Additional Commissioner Faizabad .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Birendra Narain Shukla, S.P. Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rama Raman Mishra Court No. - 4 HON'BLE IRSHAD ALI, J. 1. Heard Sri Virendra Narayan Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Rama Raman Mishra, learned counsel for respondent No.3/1 and Sri Alok Kuamr Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.1 & 2. 2. By means of present writ petition, the petitioners are challenging the orders dated 21.11.2000 and 25.05.1999 passed by respondent Nos.1 & 2 and proceeding under Section 198(4) of U.P. ZA&LR Act pending before respondent No.2. 3. Factual matrix of the case is that a lease was granted to the petitioners of plot No.327 M. The Land Management Committee passed a resolution to this effect and the approval was also granted by the SDO to the lease granted on 02.08.1989. The lease was duly executed and the petitioners' name was duly recorded in the revenue record. The petitioners planted various trees on the said plot. 4. After a lapse of more

WRIT - C No. 1003122 of 2000 at Lucknow · Niyam