WRIT - C No. 1002551 of 2006 at Lucknow

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 1002551 of 2006 Raj Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Versus Upper Ayukt Lucknow And 2 Ors. .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijay Kumar Pandey, P.V.Chaudhary Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 4 HON'BLE IRSHAD ALI, J. 1. Heard Sri P.V. Chaudhary, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rajiv Srivastava, learned Additional CSC for the respondent - State. No one has appeared for respondent No.3. 2. Seen the office report dated 01.12.2025. As per report dated 26.11.2025 undelivered cover of registered post notice issued to respondent Nos.3 & 4 has not been received back nor any vakalatnama has been filed till date. As notice was issued in 2006 i.e. more than 19 years have elapsed and no one has filed vakalatnama, notices are deemed to be sufficient upon respondent Nos.3 & 4. 3. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 07.04.2006 passed by respondent No.1 contained as Annexure No.1 to the writ petition. 4. Factual matrix of the case is that the dispute involves the descendants of Dasau (also known as Ram Das) who had two sons - Raghu Nandan and Bhajan. Raghu Nandan has six sons