Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-09

WRIT - B No. 934 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 934 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 934 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 934 of 2026 Sanju Devi And Another .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kartikey Srivastava, Rakesh Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 55 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead- Board of Revenue, Circuit Court, Agra as respondent no.5 in the array of the parties to the writ petition during Course of the day. 2. Heard Mr. Kartikey Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. T.P. Gupta, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 3. The instant petition has been filed for mandamus directing the respondent no.5/ Board of Revenue, Circuit Court, Agra to decide the Revision No.REV/94/2025/ Etah, under Section 210 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within stipulated period. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the revision filed on behalf of the petitioner arising out of mutation proceeding is pending before respondent no.5/ Board of Revenue, Circuit Court, Agra since 2025. He further submitted that the copy of memo of revision along with stay application dated

WRIT - B No. 934 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam