WRIT - B No. 933 of 2026 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 933 of 2026 Pradhumn .....Petitioner(s) Versus Smt. Sarita Tiwari And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Hari Narayan Singh Court No. - 55 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead- Board of Revenue, U.P. at Lucknow as respondent no.8 in the array of the parties to the writ petition during course of the day. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. T.P. Gupta, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Mr. Hari Narayan Singh, learned counsel for the respondent- Land Management Committee. 3. The instant petition has been filed for mandamus directing the respondent no.8/ Board of Revenue, U.P. at Lucknow to decide the Revision No.2607 of 2021, under Section 210 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Smt. Sarita Devi vs. Gyanendra & others) within stipulated period. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the revision arising out of mutation proceeding, under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 filed by private respondent is pending before respondent no.8/ Board of Revenue, U.P. at L