Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-12

WRIT - B No. 901 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 901 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 901 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 901 of 2026 Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arvind Kumar Srivastava, Bhaju Ram Pprasad Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sudhir Bharti Court No. - 54 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Instant writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following relief:- "(1)-Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and decide directing to Respondent No. 2 to the Case No. 075 of 2025 (Computerized Case No. 202554053135070075) (Krishna Gopal vs Nirmal) U/s 12 of U.P. C.H. Act, 1953, him very pending before expeditiously without granting any unnece adjournment to either parties in stipulated time/ period as granted by this Court. is, Hon'ble Court." 3. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection, if a direction is issued to decide the aforesaid case, expeditiously. 4. In this conspectus as above, no useful purpose would be served by keeping this matter pending. Therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present writ petition, without making any observati

WRIT - B No. 901 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam