WRIT - B No. 835 of 2026 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 835 of 2026 Gudia Singh Gautam .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satish Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 54 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Instant writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following relief:- "Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 to expeditiously decide the Case No.110/316 under section 12 of UPCH Act (Gudia vs. Babban) within a specified time frame period as may be determined by this Hon'ble Court under the facts and circumstances of the case." 3. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection, if a direction is issued to decide the aforesaid case, expeditiously. 4. In this conspectus as above, no useful purpose would be served by keeping this matter pending. Therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present writ petition, without making any observation on the merits of the case, as raised in the writ petition, with a direction to Respondent no.2 to decide the aforesaid case strictly in accordance w