WRIT - B No. 826 of 2026 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 826 of 2026 Geeta Devi .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 11 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Jeet Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, C.S.C. Court No. - 54 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Instant writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following relief:- "Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 to decide the Case No. 463, Computerized Case No. 202654143658050129 (Geeta Vs. Moti), under Section 9A (2) of U.P. Consolidation and Holding Act which is pending before him within fix period or stipulated period." 3. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection, if a direction is issued to decide the aforesaid case, expeditiously. 4. In this conspectus as above, no useful purpose would be served by keeping this matter pending. Therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present writ petition, without making any observation on the merits of the case, as raised in the writ petition, with a direction to Respondent no.2 to decide the aforesaid case strictly in ac