Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-11

WRIT - B No. 698 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 698 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 698 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 698 of 2026 Radhey Shyam .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kailash Nath Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 54 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Instant writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following relief:- "Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus Commanding the respondent No.2/ Deputy Director of Consolidation District- Jaunpur, District -Jaunpur to decide the Revision No. 555 of 2025 and Computerized Case No. 2019531436000012 (Radhey Shyam Vs. Vijay Bahadur) under section 48(1) of U.P. C.H. Act, situated at Village Siyaravasi, Pargana Kariya Medha, Tehsil Badlapur, District Jaunpur." 3. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection, if a direction is issued to decide the aforesaid case, expeditiously. 4. In this conspectus as above, no useful purpose would be served by keeping this matter pending. Therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present writ petition, without making any observation on the merits of the case, as raised in the writ petition, w

WRIT - B No. 698 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam