Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-10

WRIT - B No. 669 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 669 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 669 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 669 of 2026 Anil Rawat .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohd. Tauqeer, Rehana Khan, Rohit Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 54 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Instant writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following relief:- "Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 to decide the case no. 0016 of 2021 (Computerized Case No. 2021530150000016) Anil Rawat Vs. Ram Agrawal, under section 48(1) of U.P. Consolidation of Holding Act, 1953, within stipulated period of time as fixed by this Hon'ble Court. 3. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection, if a direction is issued to decide the aforesaid case, expeditiously. 4. In this conspectus as above, no useful purpose would be served by keeping this matter pending. Therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present writ petition, without making any observation on the merits of the case, as raised in the writ petition, with a direction to Respondent no.2 to decide the aforesaid ca

WRIT - B No. 669 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam