Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-11

WRIT - B No. 4837 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 4837 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 4837 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 4837 of 2025 Satyajeet .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 20 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajahar Zamil Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 54 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to amend the prayer clause of the writ petition during course of the day. 2. Permission is granted. 3. Let necessary amendment be carried out in the prayer clause of the petition during course of the day. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. Instant writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following relief:- "1. To issue, a Writ, Order or direction in the nature of Mandamus Commanding the Respondent No. 4 to ensure the Complete Implementation of the Judgment and Order dated 25/01/2025 (Annexure No.1) passed in Appeal No. 201154054400000244 (Raj Narayan And Others Vs. Brij Narayan And Others) Rule 109 of U.P.C.H. Act, 1953 (Amar Singh vs. Brijnarayan Singh Case No. 202554054465011030 expeditiously, within a short Period so stipulated COMMISSION by this Hon'ble Court. So that Justice may be done with the Petitioner.

WRIT - B No. 4837 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam