Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-11

WRIT - B No. 2830 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 2830 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 2830 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 2830 of 2025 Malti .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 10 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bachcha Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rameshwar Prasad Shukla Court No. - 54 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Instant writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following relief:- "A. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the respondent no.2 to decide the Appeal no. TB 284, under rule 109 (3) C.H. Act, (Malti Versus Swami Nath and others), which is pending before him within the stipulated period fix by this Hon'ble Court, so that justice may be done." 3. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection, if a direction is issued to decide the aforesaid case, expeditiously. 4. In this conspectus as above, no useful purpose would be served by keeping this matter pending. Therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present writ petition, without making any observation on the merits of the case, as raised in the writ petition, with a direction to Respondent no.2 to decide the aforesaid case str

WRIT - B No. 2830 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam