Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-12

WRIT - B No. 138 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 138 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 138 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 138 of 2026 Haridwar Prasad .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bachcha Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 54 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Instant writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following relief:- "A. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding respondent no. 2 to decide the case no. the 146, computer Case No. 20025415959030122 under section 9 K (2) C.H. Act (Firangi Versus al Bahadur), which is pending before him within the stipulated period fix by this Hon'ble Court SO that justice may be done." 3. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection, if a direction is issued to decide the aforesaid case, expeditiously. 4. In this conspectus as above, no useful purpose would be served by keeping this matter pending. Therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present writ petition, without making any observation on the merits of the case, as raised in the writ petition, with a direction to Respondent no.2 to decide the aforesaid c

WRIT - B No. 138 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam