Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-24

WRIT - B No. 1100 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 1100 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 1100 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 1100 of 2026 Radha Krishan And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus Deputy Director Of Consolidation And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Agnivesh, Jadu Nandan Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 54 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard Mr. J.N. Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Sanjay Kumar Ray, learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondents. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 16.12.2025 passed by respondent no.1 and order dated 29.04.2025 passed by respondent no.2 (Annexure no.1 and 2 to the writ petition)." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that restoration application filed by father of private respondent is highly time barred, as such the delay condonation matter should be decided first. He submitted that application was filed on behalf of the petitioners before consolidation officer that delay condonation matter should decided first but petitioners' application has been rejected holding that both the matter, delay c

WRIT - B No. 1100 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam