Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-16

WRIT - B No. 1052 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 1052 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 1052 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 1052 of 2026 Tikaram .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 14 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Somit Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : Avinash Chandra Srivastava, C.S.C., Harsh Vardhan Gupta Court No. - 55 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard Sri Arunesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel, holding the brief of Sri Somit Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Harsh Vardhan Gupta, learned counsel for respondent no.11, Sri Hari Mohan Srivastava, learned Addl. C.S.C. for the state-respondents and Sri Avinash Chandra Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondent-gaon sabha. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief:- "Pass an order, directing the learned Member, Board of Revenue, Circuit Court No.2, Agra Division, Agra to decide the Suit No.SA/469/2025/Mathura (Computerized Case No.AG2025015000469) (Udit Muni and Others vs. Mahesh Kumar and Others), under Section 208 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously within the specific period." 3. Counsel for the petitioner states that second appeal, arising out of the suit for partition, filed on behalf of the petitioner along

WRIT - B No. 1052 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam