WRIT - B No. 1029 of 2026 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 1029 of 2026 Jagdish Singh And 5 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Surendra Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pradeep Singh, Rati Bhan Singh Court No. - 55 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Vakalatnama filed by Mr. Gyan Prakash Ojha, Advocate on behalf of respondent no.5 is taken on record. 2. Heard Mr. Surendra Tiwari, learned Counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Gyan Prakash Ojha, learned Counsel for respondent no.5 and Mr. Hari Mohan Srivastava, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 3. With the consent of learned Counsel for the parties, the instant petition is heard finally without inviting counter affidavit. 4. Respondent no.6 is stated to be proforma respondent, as such, notice to respondent no.6 is dispensed with. 5. Brief facts of the case are that suit under Section 229B of U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 hereinafter referred to as U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act was filed by Jagdish Singh father of petitioner nos. 1/1 to 1/5 impleading the Jomdhari as defendant. In the aforementioned suit, the written st