Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-12

WRIT - B No. 1008 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 1008 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 1008 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 1008 of 2026 Jeet Bahadur .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Milan Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, C.S.C. Court No. - 54 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Instant writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following relief:- "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent No.2, Settlement Officer of Consolidation, Jaunpur to decide the Appeal No. 1145/2024-25 U/S 11 (1) of U. P. C. H. Act (Jeet Bahadur and another Vs. Kalawati Devi and others) Village Pilkichha, Pargana-Anguli, Tehsil- Shahganj, District- Jaunpur, within stipulated time." 3. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection, if a direction is issued to decide the aforesaid case, expeditiously. 4. In this conspectus as above, no useful purpose would be served by keeping this matter pending. Therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present writ petition, without making any observation on the merits of the case, as raised in the writ petition, with a direction to

WRIT - B No. 1008 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam