Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-16

WRIT - A No. 3592 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 3592 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 3592 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 3592 of 2026 Smt. Indubala Singh .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Radhey Shyam Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Radhey Shyam Yadav, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Rahul Malviya, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The case of the writ petitioner is that he was appointed on the post of Constable on 01.11.1985 and superannuated on 01.07.2020, however, the writ petitioner is not being paid pensionary benefits to the tune of Rs. 53,500/- instead of he is being paid Rs. 50,500/-, the writ petitioner is not being accorded increments. 3. Learned Standing Counsel submits that the claim of the writ petitioner shall be decided by District third respondent, Finance Controller, U.P. Police, Headquarters, Lucknow. 4. Considering the submission so made across the bar, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the writ petitioner to submit a comprehensive representation along with self attested copy of the writ petition and certified copy of the order before the third respondent, Finance C

WRIT - A No. 3592 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam