Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-16

WRIT - A No. 3590 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 3590 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 3590 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 3590 of 2026 Kajal Rani And 8 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus Union Of India And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kiran Rani, Laloo Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Shiv Kumar Pal Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Laloo Yadav, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri S.K. Pal, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. Sri S.K. Pal, learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that this Court may not have territorial jurisdiction to entertain the present writ petition with respect to writ petitioners no. 3, 5, 6 and 8 on the ground that the selection of the writ petitioners no. 3, 5, 6 and 8 have been conducted in West Bengal, New Delhi and Bhopal. 3. Confronted with the said situation, learned counsel for the writ petitioner seeks to withdraw the present writ petition insofar as the writ petitioners no. 3, 5, 6 and 8 are concerned with the liberty to approach the Court having territorial jurisdiction. 4. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with respect to writ petitioners no. 3, 5, 6 and 8 to approach the Court having territorial jurisdiction. 5. The grievan

WRIT - A No. 3590 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam