Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-16

WRIT - A No. 3573 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 3573 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 3573 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 3573 of 2026 Rajendra Prasad Sahay .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pawan Giri Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Pawan Giri, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Vivek Singh, learned Standing Counsel, who appears for State-respondents. 2. The case of the writ petitioner is that the writ petitioner was appointed on the post of Peon on adhoc basis in the office of Regional Transport Officer, Varanasi on 03.03.1992. The writ petitioner has been accorded two ACPs and the writ petitioner promoted on the post of Senior Assistant and superannuated on 31.07.2025, however, the writ petitioner has not been paid pension. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner relies upon a judgment in Writ-A No. 1115 of 2025, decided on 06.02.2026. 3. Prayer in the present petition is for a direction to the respondents to consider the claim. 4. Learned Standing Counsel submits that the claim of the writ petitioner needs adjudication at the first instance by the second respondent, Additional Transport Commissioner (Administration),

WRIT - A No. 3573 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam