Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-16

WRIT - A No. 3541 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 3541 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 3541 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 3541 of 2026 Ram Singh Gautam .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Rajesh Kumar Chaudhary, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Gaurav Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The writ petitioner claims to have been appointed as Technical Assistant on contractual basis in MGNREGA in District Basti in the year 2007. The writ petitioner superannuated on 25.01.2025. The writ petitioner claims payment of E.P.F. 3. Learned Standing Counsel on the other hand submits that the claim of the writ petitioner needs adjudication at the first instance by Respondent no.5. 4. Considering the submissions so made across the Bar, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation along with self attested copy of the writ petition and the certified copy of the order before Respondent no.5, who on the said motion shall proceed to consider the claim of the writ petitioner strictly in accordance with law within a period of thre

WRIT - A No. 3541 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam