Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-16

WRIT - A No. 3518 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 3518 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 3518 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 3518 of 2026 Vikas Pandey .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Astitva Srivastava, Pankaj Kumar Srivastava, Sasmita Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Astitva Srivastava, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Awadhesh Kumar Shukla, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The case of the writ petitioner is that he was appointed on the post of Gram Vikas Adhikari on 26.07.1999 and while he was performing the duties, allegation was levelled upon the writ petitioner that he did not furnish the documents which were sought for and show cause notice came to be issued on 05.06.2025 under the signatures of District Panchayat Raj Officer, Pilibhit show causing the writ petitioner for the acts and the omissions referable to the period from 2018-19 in exercise of the powers under Sections 256(1), 257(2), 259(1) and 259(2) of the U.P. Panchayat Raj Rules, 1947. 3. Questioning the same, the present writ petition has been preferred. 4. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner has submitted that the order im

WRIT - A No. 3518 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam