Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-12

WRIT - A No. 3401 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 3401 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 3401 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 3401 of 2026 Janardan Prasad And 13 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Deshraj Garg Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the writ petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The case of the writ petitioners is that all the writ petitioners are Sub- Inspectors in Civil Police and have rendered 19 years of service. The claim of the writ petitioners is that they are entitled to the benefits which had been accorded to the writ petitioners in Writ Petition No. 44330 of 2012 (Ghanshyam Tiwari & Others Vs. State of U.P. & Others) and the Government Orders so issued thereon. Submission is that they have rendered more than 19 years of service, thus, they are entitled to grant of one additional increment according to the Government Order dated 02.12.2020. 3. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel did not dispute the judgement dated 07.09.2012 passed in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 44330 of 2012 (Ghanshyam Tiwari & Others versus State of U.P. & Others) along with similar petition whic

WRIT - A No. 3401 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam