Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-12

WRIT - A No. 3388 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 3388 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 3388 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 3388 of 2026 Narendra Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kushal Raj Chaudhary, Pradeep Saxena, Ram Naresh Maurya Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Pradeep Saxena, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Gaurav Singh, learned Standing Counsel, who appears for State-respondents. 2. The counsel for the rival parties have made a joint statement that they do not propose to file any further affidavits thus with the consent of the parties, writ petition is being decided at the fresh stage. 3. The case of the writ petitioner is that he is a Class-IV employee who was working in the office of Zila Krishi Raksha Adhikari, Bareilly and he came to be transferred on 29.06.2024, he was transferred to the office of Deputy Director of Agriculture, Pilibhit. The said transfer order came to be challenged in Writ-A No. 14380 of 2024 which came to be dismissed on 21.09.2024 against which the writ petitioner preferred a Special Appeal No. 977 of 2024 which was also dismissed on 24.10.2024 thereafter the writ petitioner repre

WRIT - A No. 3388 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam