Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-20

WRIT - A No. 3387 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 3387 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 3387 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 3387 of 2026 Kepin Kumar Constable .....Petitioner(s) Versus State of U.P. and 3 others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arpan Kumar Pandey, Namit Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Namit Srivastava, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Gaurav Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. This Court entertained the writ petition on 12.03.2026 seeking the instructions. Today, instructions have been produced under the signatures of the Circle Officer (Traffic), District Kannauj dated March 2026. 3. Sri Gaurav Singh, learned Standing Counsel has made a statement that he is well equipped with the instructions and is in a position to argue the case. He does not propose to file any counter affidavit and he further submits that the writ petition be decided on the basis of the documents available on record. 4. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is being decided at the fresh stage. 5. The case of the writ petitioner is that he was appointed on the post of Head Constable and was accorded the work of Head Moharrir in Police Station-

WRIT - A No. 3387 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam