Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-31

WRIT - A No. 3351 of 2026 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 3351 of 2026 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 3351 of 2026 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 3351 of 2026 Union Of India, Thru. Director General Deptt. Of Posts Dak Bhawan New Delhi And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus Shailesh Singh .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Varun Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Vijayendra Prakash Tripathi Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard Dr. Vandana Singh, Advocate holding brief of Shri Varun Pandey, learned counsel appearing for petitioners/Union of India and Shri V. K. Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. By means of the instant writ petition, the Union of India has challenged the judgment and order dated 02.07.2025 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Lucknow. 3. The facts of the case are that the respondent along with others applied for being considered for recruitment and appointment as Gramin Dak Sevak. Ten persons were called along with respondent-original applicant. He was appointed on 22.04.2015 and joined on 09.05.2015. He started discharging his duties till his services were terminated vide order dated 02.09.2015 without issuing any show cause notice. The ground for termination was firstly

WRIT - A No. 3351 of 2026 at Lucknow · Niyam