Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-10

WRIT - A No. 3306 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 3306 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 3306 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 3306 of 2026 Shailesh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pankaj Barman Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mahendra Narain Singh Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Pankaj Barman, learned counsel for the writ petitioner, Sri Manish Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Avijit Saxena, learned counsel for the Commission. 2. The case of the writ petitioner is that he was appointed on the post of Junior Engineer in the Irrigation Department (Mechanical), at Nalkoop Khand, Ghaziabad. The next post, which the writ petitioner is entitled to be considered for the promotion on the post of Assistant Engineer. According to the writ petitioner, there happens to be a Recruitment Rules by the name and nomenclature of Uttar Pradesh Service of Irrigation Department (U.P. Services Rules 2007), which stood notified on 16.11.2007. It is also the case of the writ petitioner that post completion of 7 years of service as contemplated under Rule 5 read with Rule 16, which provides for recruitment by promotion, the writ petitioner ought to have been

WRIT - A No. 3306 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam