Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-31

WRIT - A No. 3267 of 2026 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 3267 of 2026 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 3267 of 2026 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 3267 of 2026 Raj Pal Singh .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Krishi Vipran And Videsh Vyapar Anubhag Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhilesh Pratap Singh, Kushagra Kanodia Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Surendra Kumar Singh Court No. - 17 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Saharsh Srivastava, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the respondent/ opposite party no. 1 and Shri Surendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for respondent/ opposite party nos. 2 and 3. 2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed the following relief :- "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus, commanding the Respondents, in particular Respondent No. 2, to forthwith re-compute and release to the Petitioner the full and correct amount of gratuity strictly in terms of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, by duly taking into account his entire period of continuous service commencing from the date of his initial appointment up to the date of superannuation; in the light of the judgment of this Hon'ble Court rendered

WRIT - A No. 3267 of 2026 at Lucknow · Niyam