WRIT - A No. 3219 of 2026 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 3219 of 2026 Brijnandan And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Narendra Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Narendra Srivastava, learned counsel for the writ petitioners and Sri Jitendra Prasad, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The grievance of the writ petitioners, who are three in number, is that they were engaged as Seasonal Collection Peon on 01.02.1994, 20.01.1994 and 25.06.1998, however, they seek regularization/ absorption as Collection Peon while according age relaxation. 3. Learned Standing Counsel on the other hand submits that the claim of the writ petitioner needs adjudication at the first instance by Respondent no.3. 4. Considering the submissions so made across the Bar, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation along with self attested copy of the writ petition and the certified copy of the order before Respondent no.3, who on the said motion shall proceed to consider the claim of the writ petitioner stric