WRIT - A No. 3218 of 2026 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 3218 of 2026 Shiv Sewak Singh And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashok Kumar Pandey, Priti Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Ashok Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the writ petitioners and Sri Jitendra Prasad, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The grievance of the writ petitioners, who are three in number, is that though they have retired as Deputy Director of Education (Secondary) on various dates, however they are entitled to second ACP w.e.f. 03.10.2016, which has already been extended to similarly situated incumbents in terms of Government Order dated 27.06.2017. 3. Learned Standing Counsel on the other hand submits that the claim of the writ petitioner needs adjudication at the first instance by Respondent no.2. 4. Considering the submissions so made across the Bar, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation along with self attested copy of the writ petition and the certified copy of the order before Respondent no.2