Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-09

WRIT - A No. 3195 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 3195 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 3195 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 3195 of 2026 Akhilesh Singh .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kaustubh Tripathi, Manjari Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Siddharth Singhal Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Kaustubh Tripathi, learned counsel for the writ petitioner as well as Sri Rahul Malviya, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Siddharth Singhal for respondents. 2. The case of the writ petitioner is that an advertisement came to be published by the second respondent being Advertisement No. 08-Exam/2022 for Combined Assistant Mains Examination. The writ petitioner applied and thereafter, the Mains Eligibility Result came to be published on 13.07.2023 thereafter for the Mains Examination provisional admit card was issued the writ petitioner was qualified the same, however, according to the writ petitioner who has been selected but has not been issued appointment order. 3. Prayer in the present petition is to issue appointment order. 4. Sri Rahul Malviya, learned Standing Counsel submits that a perusal of the representation preferred by the writ petitioner o

WRIT - A No. 3195 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam