Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-09

WRIT - A No. 3188 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 3188 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 3188 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 3188 of 2026 Anoop Kumar Shrivastava .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 Other .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Divyanshu Pandey, Utkarsh Malviya Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Utkarsh Malviya, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri P.K. Srivastava, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The sole prayer made in the present petition is for a direction to the second respondent, District Magistrate, Chandauli, to decide the appeal, which the writ petitioner had preferred on 24.01.2025 against the punishment order dated 26.12.2024. 3. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the same. 4. Considering the submissions so made across the Bar, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the Respondent No.2 to decide the pending appeal within a period of two months from today. March 9, 2026 N.S.Rathour (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Digitally signed by :- NIPENDRA SINGH RATHOUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

WRIT - A No. 3188 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam