Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-09

WRIT - A No. 3185 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 3185 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 3185 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 3185 of 2026 Yaseen Khan .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhilesh Kumar Mishra, Rashmi Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Akhilesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Pramod Kumar Srivastava, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The case of the writ petitioner is that he was initially appointed as Commission Amin in Revene Department and he superannuated on 31.07.2021 as the writ petitioner was not being paid the pensionary benefits so the writ petitioner preferred Writ-A No. 21447 of 2021 in which on 28.04.2023, the following orders were passed.- "1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Shachi Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. An objection has been raised by the learned Standing Counsel that petitioner ought to have impleaded Principal Secretary, Co-operative in place of Principal Secretary, Revenue as the petitioner was working in the department which comes under Principal Secretary, Co-operative, therefore

WRIT - A No. 3185 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam