Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-09

WRIT - A No. 3179 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 3179 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 3179 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 3179 of 2026 Jagdish Sharan Pateriya .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shagun K. Saran, Ujjawal Satsangi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Bal Mukund, C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Ujjawal Satsangi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Manish Kumar, learned Standing Counsel, who appears for State- respondents as well as Shri Bal Mukund, counsel for the respondent no. 2. 2. The case of the writ petitioner is that though he was appointed as Zone Worker in District Youth and Prantiya Raksha Dal Department at District Jhansi on 01.02.1955 and he was promoted from time to time and he superannuated on 30.06.1992 but the writ petitioner has not been paid the General Provident Fund. 3. Prayer in the present petition is for a direction to the respondents to consider the claim. 4. Learned Standing Counsel as well as Shri Bal Mukund, counsel for the respondent no. 2 submit that though as per Annexure-1 at page 13, there happens to be a document entitling payment of 90% of the General Provident Fund but it is the State which has to make

WRIT - A No. 3179 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam