Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-09

WRIT - A No. 3178 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 3178 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 3178 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 3178 of 2026 Beera Ram And 12 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shishir Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Shishir Kumar, counsel for the petitioners and Sri Manish Kumar, learned Standing Counsel, who appears for State-respondents. 2. The case of the writ petitioners is that they have worked the service period spent by them while undergoing training before they were appointed as constables and should be counted being 19 years of service for grant of one additional increment. They seek to rely upon the judgment in Special Appeal No. 172 of 2023 (State of U.P. and 6 others v. Ram Jeet Tiwari (H. Con.) and 6 others, decided on 19.04.2023. 3. Prayer in the present petition is for a direction to the respondents to consider the grievance of the writ petitioners. 4. Learned Standing Counsel submits that the claim of the writ petitioners needs adjudication at the first instance by the concerned authorities. 5. To such a submission, learned counsel for the petitioners has no objection and he gracefully acce

WRIT - A No. 3178 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam