Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-09

WRIT - A No. 3161 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 3161 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 3161 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 3161 of 2026 Mukesh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of Up And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dhananjai Rai, Vibhu Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Vibhu Rai, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Gaurav Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Sri Gaurav Singh, learned Standing Counsel has made a statement that he is well equipped with the instructions and is in a position to argue the case. He does not propose to file any counter affidavit and he further submits that the writ petition be decided on the basis of the documents available on record. 3. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is being decided at the fresh stage. 4. The case of the writ petitioner is that he was appointed on the post of Platoon Commander in the year 1999. Thereafter, he was promoted on the post of Inspector (Home Guard) in the year 2003 and further promoted on the post of District Commandant on 14.12.2005. It is also the case of the writ petitioner that he was placed under suspension on 19.11.2019 owing to certain misconduct, therea

WRIT - A No. 3161 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam