Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-16

WRIT - A No. 3145 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 3145 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 3145 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 3145 of 2026 Vinod Kumar Varun .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : C.S.C., Rajendra Prasad Shukla, Rishabh Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Rejendra Prasad Shukla, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Rahul Malviya, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The writ petitioner claims to be appointed as Gram Panchayat Adhikari, however, he has been placed under suspension owing to allegations relatable to committing misconduct on 16.01.2026, however, instructions have been produced today according to which charge sheet has been issued containing as many as four charges dated 22.02.2026. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner submits that the inquiry be directed to be concluded within a period of three months and the writ petitioner be paid subsistence allowance. 3. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the same. 4. Considering the submissions so made across the bar, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the respondents o conclude the inquiry within a period of three months from today

WRIT - A No. 3145 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam