Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-24

WRIT - A No. 3130 of 2026 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 3130 of 2026 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 3130 of 2026 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 3130 of 2026 Vivekanand Pandey .....Petitioner(s) Versus Director Rajya Krishi Utpadan Mandi Parishad U.P. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajiv Srivastava, Avadhesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Surendra Kumar Singh Court No. - 17 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Heard. 2. This petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "(i) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the opposite parties to consider and allow the petitioner the conversion of pay from 4th pay to 5th from 1.1.1996 and 6th pay from 1.1.2006 and allow all the benefits of salary as per admissible in law considering the services of the deponent in regular scale of pay for the post. (ii) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the opposite parties to pay to the petitioner, all the arrears of salary with interest." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that benefit of the salary, which was given by the 5th and 6th Pay Commission, has not been paid to the petitioner. He further submits that identical the controversy has already been decided by this

WRIT - A No. 3130 of 2026 at Lucknow · Niyam