WRIT - A No. 3011 of 2026 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 3011 of 2026 Peetam Singh And 47 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus The State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aditya Prakash Verma, Ranjana Verma, Shailesh Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Shailesh Verma, learned counsel for the writ petitioners and Sri R.S. Umrao, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Sri R.S. Umrao has made a statement at bar that he is well equipped with the instructions and he is in a position to argue the matter and he does not propose to file any affidavit and the writ petition be decided on the basis of the documents available on record. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is being decided at this stage. 3. The case of the writ petitioners is that the writ petitioners are Ex Army Men, details whereof has been given in para 9 of the writ petition which is quoted as under.- "9. That it is relevant to point out here that the petitioner no. 1 was enrolled in the Army on 25.04.1995 and was discharged on 31.03.2017; the petitioner no. 2 was enrolled in the Army on 03.11.1995 and was discharged on 3