Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-11

WRIT - A No. 148 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 148 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 148 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 148 of 2026 Rajeev Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Versus Union Of India And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vishveshwar Mani Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Ravi Prakash Singh Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Vikas Yadav (AoR No. A/V 1683/2023) holding brief of Sri Vishveshwar Mani Tripathi, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Ravi Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. Sri Ravi Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the respondents has made a statement that pursuant to the order dated 12.01.2026, he is possessed with the instructions under the signatures of M/s OIC Legal Cell dated 10.01.2026 and he is in a position to argue the matter. 3. The case of the writ petitioner is that the writ petitioner was an aspirant for selection on the post of Agniveer Tradesman. The selection stood conducted. He claims to have been selected, however owing to the pendency of the Criminal Case no. 79 of 2023, under Sections 323, 312, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. Gola, District Gorakhpur. The writ petitioner alleges that he had not been permitted to join the post in question. 4. In

WRIT - A No. 148 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam