Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-17

WRIT - A No. 13084 of 2025 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 13084 of 2025 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 13084 of 2025 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13084 of 2025 Syed Mohammad Jaki .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : D.K. Singh Chauhan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Mr.D. K. Singh Chauhan, learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed challenging order dated 17.10.2025 whereby opposite parties have declined pensionary benefits to petitioner including gratuity and leave encashment. Further prayer has been made for a direction to opposite parties for payment of pension, gratuity and leave encasement from date of confirmation on 01.03.1991 with interest. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner was initially appointed in leave vacancy on the post of Consolidation Lekhpal on 03.07.1987 for a period of two months which was continued and vide order dated 01.03.1991, petitioner was confirmed on the post of Consolidation Lekhpal on which he continued and was subsequently promoted on the post of Consolidator vide order dated 08.09.2008 and was also

WRIT - A No. 13084 of 2025 at Lucknow · Niyam