UBAIDUR RAHMAN vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 12.03.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 2666/2025, CRL.M.A. 20729/2025, CRL.M.A. 20730/2025 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 1548/2025 UBAIDUR RAHMAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Raman Yadav, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with SI Sumeet Poonia. Ms. Puneeta Kapur, Advocate for complainant de facto. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 263/2025 of PS Vivek Vihar for offence under Section 420/406/34 IPC. 2. This anticipatory bail application came up for the first hearing on 21.07.2025 before the predecessor bench and thereafter continued getting adjourned before different benches. By way of order dated 15.12.2025, the BAIL APPLN. 2666/2025 Page 1 of 5 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA GIRISH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45 Signature Not Verified 569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1557 0996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, Digitally Signed cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.03.12 17:27:52 -07'00' By:DIKSHA RAWAT Signing Date:12.03.2026 17:39:34 predecessor bench granted interim protection to the accused/applicant from arrest. Thereafter, along with 179 such old pending bail applications, this application was transferred to this bench and today is the first hearing before me. 3. Broadly speaking, prosecution case, as explained by learned counsel for complainant de facto is as follows. The accused/applicant entered into an agreement with the complainant de facto under which the accused/applicant was to manufacture products whi