Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-03-11

SUNNY MADAN vs THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI

Citation / case number
BAIL APPLN.-941/2026 2026:DHC:2024
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
SUNNY MADAN
Respondent
THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 11.03.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 941/2026 & CRL.M.A. 7187/2026 SUNNY MADAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Bhuvnesh Shukla, Advocate versus THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for State with SI Pushpendra, PS Jagat Puri CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 642/2025 of PS Jagat Puri for offence under Section 316(2)/3(5) BNS. 2. Broadly speaking, the allegation against the accused/applicant is that he hired a car from the complainant de facto and thereafter, sold away the same to someone. 3. Learned counsel for accused/applicant submits that there is no evidence to show that the car was recovered from him or that he received BAIL APPLN. 941/2026 pages GIRISH 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6fb4 835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - KATHPALIA 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996b40f80cbd 4. Learned APP for State accepts notice and in all fairness, on instructions of the IO/SI Pushpender, submits that the accused/applicant can be granted