SUHAIL vs STATE OF NCT DELHI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 09.03.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 1718/2025 & CRL.M.A. 13758/2025 SUHAIL .....Petitioner Through: None. versus STATE OF NCT DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with SHO Satvinder Rana and SI Anil. Ms. Surbhi Arora, Advocate for complainant. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 706/2017 of PS Seemapuri for offence under Section 302/392/397/34 IPC and Section 25/27 Arms Act. 2. None appears on behalf of accused/applicant. However, I have examined the record and heard learned prosecutor. 3. Broadly speaking, the allegation according to prosecution is that three BAIL APPLN. 1718/2025 pages 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45 4. The accused Waseem, who allegedly fired at the injured has already been granted bail by a coordinate bench vide order dated 25.10.2024 mainly on the ground that the alleged eye witness did not support prosecution case. 5. Learned APP in all fairness does not challenge that in view of role ascribed to the accused/applicant, he deserves parity. 6. Accordingly, the application is allowed and the accused/appl