Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-20

SPECIAL APPEAL No. 318 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
SPECIAL APPEAL No. 318 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
SPECIAL APPEAL No. 318 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 318 of 2026 Smt. Suman Rao .....Appellant(s) Versus Kusum Devi And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Appellant(s) : Tanuj Shahi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ashish Kumar (Nagvanshi), C.S.C., Ramesh Chandra Dwivedi, Shesh Kumar Srivastava Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J. HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J. 1. Heard Sri Tanuj Shahi, learned counsel for the appellant, Sri Ramesh Chandra Dwivedi, learned counsel for the original petitioner/respondents, Sri Ashish Kumar (Nagvanshi), learned counsel for the Board, Ms. Beena Mishra, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Shesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondent nos.4 and 5 and Sri Rajiv Gupta, learned Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Submission is once the petition was described as non-maintainable by the writ court, no jurisdiction may have survived with the court to call for any report or to pass any other or further order. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the complainant petitioner/respondent would refer to the facts arising from the earlier decision of the writ court in Garima Singh v. State of U.P. and Others, 2026 SCC Online All 159 w

SPECIAL APPEAL No. 318 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam