Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-12

SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. 959 of 2014 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. 959 of 2014 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. 959 of 2014 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 959 of 2014 State of U.P. Sec. Basic Education and 2 others .....Appellant(s) Versus Shyam Nath Yadav and 22 others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Appellant(s) : Rajiv Singh, S.C. Counsel for Respondent(s) : Bheem Singh Chief Justice's Court HON'BLE ARUN BHANSALI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J. Civil Misc. Delay Condonation Application 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. In view of the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, we are satisfied that the applicant was prevented by sufficient cause from preferring the Special Appeal within the period of limitation. 3. The application is, accordingly, allowed and the delay in filing the Special Appeal is condoned. Order on memo of appeal 1. It is stated by learned counsel for the parties that the issues raised in this Special Appeal stand concluded by the judgement of date rendered in Special Appeal No. 734 of 2014. 2. In view of the judgment passed in Special Appeal No. 734 of 2014, this Special Appeal is liable to be dismissed. 3. The Special Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. Ma

SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. 959 of 2014 at Allahabad · Niyam